Category
6 articles
Explaining your code aloud has quietly become a lost art, and AI assistants that answer before we've finished forming the question are making it worse. Here's my case for treating verbal explanation as a hard technical skill — and the rituals that build it.
Somewhere along the way, tech hiring decided that inverting a binary tree on a whiteboard tells you anything about shipping software. It doesn't — and with AI tools in every pocket, the gap between interview theater and the actual job has never been wider.
Code debt gets the war room treatment. Documentation debt gets a sticky note on someone's monitor that nobody reads after Tuesday. But the consequences of letting your docs rot are quietly more dangerous than most teams want to admit.
Every architectural shortcut your team takes today is quietly compounding interest in the background. What starts as a reasonable tradeoff can quietly balloon into a six-figure liability that derails roadmaps and burns out your best engineers.
Most teams have a graveyard of third-party integrations quietly rotting in their codebase — deprecated APIs still making network calls, abandoned SDKs nobody's touched in years, and webhook handlers for services that shut down in 2021. Cleaning up this invisible technical debt isn't glamorous, but ignoring it is quietly costing you more than you think.
Chasing the hottest JavaScript framework feels like a developer rite of passage, but what does it actually cost you in time, sanity, and shipping velocity? After spending a year deliberately building the same feature set across three different frameworks, I have some thoughts — and not all of them are flattering to the shiny new thing.